The Fly (1958)
2013-17819
The
film piqued my interest right from the beginning because it started in medias
res[1]. The story started with a puzzling situation that made more and more sense
as one of the main characters recalls the events. Another reason why the film
caught my attention is the great mind of the scientist Andre. He was able to
create something so genius yet, he does not make wise decisions. A scientist
must know what and who NOT to test their experiments with, especially if their
inventions are still prototypes.
The
film showcased scientists as the key to helping society have an easier and more
efficient life in the future. It is sending a message that scientists mean
well. But sometimes, they cross a very thin line when they don’t follow safety
rules and laboratory conducts. They could actually harm society (and in the
film’s case, even the scientists themselves); the opposite of what they are
actually trying to do. The only issue of morality play in the film was if Helen,
wife of Andre, is guilty for murdering a part-man, part-fly creature. If the
verdict is yes, then the police chief is also guilty of murder for smashing the
part-man, part-fly creature.
Based
on the film, people from the 1950s were very imaginative. They were able to
think of a device so complicated, that even now in the 2010s seem very far from
possible. Aside from being imaginative, they were also innovative. Did you see
that teleporting machine? It had lots of knobs to turn as you set it up. It
even had different colored neon lights that lit up as the machine processes the
disintegration and reintegration of molecules. Now that’s creative!
Walang komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento