I found
The Fly interesting and a film
nothing short of entertainment. It had a sense of mystery that I liked. The film’s subtle foreshadows encouraged the
audience to piece the plot together, only to be shocked at the plot twist. The
scientific grounds were also interesting. The logic of teleportation,
disintegration and re-integration, seemed to be sound. However, I found the
human-fly mutation a bit sketchy. Questions like, “Why was a big part of his
body a fly if a fly was contains relatively little “fly” molecules?”, came to
mind.
A
scientist was regarded as “an explorer in a wild country where no one had ever
been before”. The film regarded science as a “search for the truth” which is the
most important work in the world but also the most dangerous. The film also
presents 2 messages, that the boundaries of science should be pushed in the
quest for knowledge and secondly, that in spite of this, science also has a
limit and that there are some things that should not be tampered with.
In a
deeper sense, the film is a play on morality. It depicts conducts of science,
especially the achievement of something near impossible, as “playing God”. It
also gives the message that the sacredness of life should always be respected
and that life is not something one should take for granted. Although we have
the capabilities and intelligence to explore the world and the laws of nature,
we should keep in mind the limits of what we can manipulate.
In the
1950s, science and technology was viewed as a field with infinite possibilities
for new discoveries and inventions that will benefit mankind. However, it was
also regarded with fear, a fear that one day we may misuse it and end up with
disastrous consequences.
2013-13861
2013-13861
Walang komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento